Sorry if I call you gentlemen, but do not know them very well
These are my principles, if not like, I have others
Television has done wonders for my culture. As soon as someone turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book
I've had a great night. But it has been.
Never forget a face. But in his case, an exception will
He may look like an idiot and act like an idiot. But do not be fooled: it is really an idiot
From the day I picked up your book, I fell to the floor rolling with laughter. Someday I hope to read
Outside the dog, a book is probably man's best friend. And inside the dog's probably too dark to read
Why should I care about posterity? What has posterity ever done for me?
Of course I understand, even a child of five could understand. To bring a child of five!
I must confess I was born at an early age
Or you is dead or my watch has stopped
Starting from scratch reached the highest peaks of poverty
Marriage is a great institution. Especially if you like living in an institution
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it, make a diagnosis falsoy then applying the wrong remedies.
¿Room service? Drop me a bigger room
I can not say I do not disagree with you
Behind every man is a great woman. Behind her is his wife
Marriage is the leading cause of divorce
Do not think badly of me, miss, my interest in you, is purely sexual.
I enjoyed this book, especially at the break.

Groucho Marx

Popularity: 20% [ ? ]

Review

February 21, 2006

Ruben

3 Comments

Objectivity and Subjectivity

Today I want to write a little something every time there is less talk time, and Objectivity is the time to say things, which I think does not pay much attention when we speak but it is important. And this comes about that the other day coming out of an exam, I and another colleague, we find a third party who asked for the review, and without thinking twice my companion said, Bua, will overrun review, fatal . And another said: Then go, luckily I have not gone.
And that's just the conversation about the exam, BUT WAS NOT RIGHT WHAT HE SAID THERE.
Since my partner speak from total subjectivity, and from which you tried to get a signature whole two days, and the other does not contrast the information and believed it, and went with the wrong way.
The right thing would have been to provide data because it was difficult, or why not, but often ignores this and tend to believe what we are told, nothing more.
OBJECTIVELY have to say for whom he had gone to class, done the exercises, and followed the subject fairly and reviewed the 5 I had to take, then maybe for the nerves and other things do not take it out, but the exam was objectively easy to pass.
And so I suppose it could be extrapolated to many situiaciones that is sure to go out the day but you do not realize, because it is taken as "normal."
And although it is often important, decisions often have to perform after hearing things about someone, they can be mistaken if you do not say things objectively and if the subjectivity with which one tends to say things when he speaks.
Anyway we must not go to extremes, but as all know how to interpret, and then give things the degree of objectivity or objectivity necessary to avoid misunderstandings due to this cause then, aprantemente absurd but can easily alter reality.