Friendship (Personal Reflection)

The other day I had an interesting conversation with Dorian about friendship and I really found it very fruitful in that they shared the same opinion, but with nuances similar to the end. And in a reflective moment as I realized how many people I know, I have known and will know, is that if anything characterizes the human being think it is because the mass of people around you along her life.

That's not bad, of course not, but it may seem unpleasant, I think what is wrong if people consider all friends, or put another way, consider all people with the same level of relationship.

Why I came to this conclusion?, Then noting that almost the first thing you do when two people now know is "giving the messenguer" how many times I have asked and I declined!, But not because they want to, but because it is not necessary to have direct contact with all persons involved in your life, which some people feel almost offended but you do.

But that need not be an unpleasant fact, not mean that the person occupies a place inferior to others, do not want to be associated with it, etc, but simply its role for you is another, the matter is that people do not always accept our rightful role in relation to another person. This does not mean that over time, that role can not change and a person who in principle to yourself is a co-worker, can occupy an important role in your life, but that is the time which is determined not be known simply as so many people seem to believe.

And all this may seem negative, need not be, okay, you can think, but that this way of being selfish, because establishing roles, close the door in advance to people who can be wonderful without the opportunity of that they know better. Error. Because as I said before, the time may change the role of a person and become important in your life, and honestly, many arguments or misunderstandings between people, I think they give it, by pretending that all people are that have a close relationship, when that is impossible.

Or to put it a bit harder, but that basically is the reality, the relationship between you and the people around you should be based on categories: Coworkers, Friends, Friends of march ..... but some are better than others, need not, in fact, often can be better co-worker that a friend indeed, but maybe if you were to change role, worsen your relationship with him.

So ultimately, the keys to an order in your personal life is to have clear boundaries between the different levels that each person holds in your life, without a means to be worse than another, that time can decide where to end each one, and conversely, to know what role you occupy for other people and trying to understand, as many problems as I said, they appear when other people do not understand their role, wanting to get into another that is not theirs, at least yet.

Of course for no good writer, haha, because express my thoughts clearly not something that I very well, after reading what I wrote, , But hey, sure with your power of reasoning understand what I mean, after already agreeing or not depends on each.

Be happy.

Popularity: 12% [ ? ]

Duda circulatory

Surely many times, especially if you are a driver you will have had difficult times in roundabouts because drivers often do not heed the signs correctly, and if not for their own precautions would have been more had a stroke.

Well, it is that today's post to see if I think I have reason, or act wrongly in my driving, which almost brings me to a crash that could have been quite important in a roundabout with another vehicle. So expose the situation:

As seen in the picture below, the situation was clear, a 2-lane road with a roundabout joining, also 2 lanes and 2 lane exit are the roundabout. So far so normal, and the incorporation was normal, my car (green square) is incorporated into the right lane and outside, and the other vehicle into the left lane and inside, the problem came later, as the roundabout is also 2 lanes out. then, what happened is what you see in the picture:

The roundabout had no directional arrows (was under construction), but I understand that though there are two exit lanes, which is on the outside lane, ie I have the ability to exit the roundabout or turn on the roundabout while going through the interior can only continue to spin even though there are two lanes. or exit in the event that no one came not from the outside, but without preference. Anyway, that thought he could get out, I started to turn purple and the point we had to slam on the brakes to avoid empotrarnos. Therefore:

What think you?

a) He who is on the inside lane can only turn at the roundabout, and how much came out but no one on the outside lane and he that is on the outside can exit the roundabout Or continue turning.

b) Who is on the outside lane must necessarily leave the roundabout and he who is on the inside lane roundabout can choose to leave or go around the roundabout

c) Whether you're on the inside lane of the roundabout or the outside lane can choose to walk around the roundabout or exit the roundabout because there are two lanes. (The truth is that this seems like complete chaos, but surely someone thinks)

d) Another option that can be named and correct.

The case is that looking at it coldly, like the right choice is b) and that is on the outside can only leave the roundabout, Nose, I'm confused, so I hope your comments to help me know if it works properly or not

Edited and updated

Apparently, following recent comments, while the other car as I do, we act incorrectly and the correct maneuver would have been:

Me: Because I wanted it to turn, should have gone down the inside of the roundabout and just before reaching the exit to the outside lane change me.

The other car: that was to follow straight, should have gone down the outside lane of the roundabout.

More information in the comments, and root of all this, certainly if we can say that people rarely act properly at roundabouts if ever, .

Popularity: 24% [ ? ]

Objectivity and Subjectivity

Today I want to write a little something every time there is less talk time, and Objectivity is the time to say things, which I think does not pay much attention when we speak but it is important. And this comes about that the other day coming out of an exam, I and another colleague, we find a third party who asked for the review, and without thinking twice my companion said, Bua, will overrun review, fatal . And another said: Then go, luckily I have not gone.
And that's just the conversation about the exam, BUT WAS NOT RIGHT WHAT HE SAID THERE.
Since my partner speak from total subjectivity, and from which you tried to get a signature whole two days, and the other does not contrast the information and believed it, and went with the wrong way.
The right thing would have been to provide data because it was difficult, or why not, but often ignores this and tend to believe what we are told, nothing more.
OBJECTIVELY have to say for whom he had gone to class, done the exercises, and followed the subject fairly and reviewed the 5 I had to take, then maybe for the nerves and other things do not take it out, but the exam was objectively easy to pass.
And so I suppose it could be extrapolated to many situiaciones that is sure to go out the day but you do not realize, because it is taken as "normal."
And although it is often important, decisions often have to perform after hearing things about someone, they can be mistaken if you do not say things objectively and if the subjectivity with which one tends to say things when he speaks.
Anyway we must not go to extremes, but as all know how to interpret, and then give things the degree of objectivity or objectivity necessary to avoid misunderstandings due to this cause then, aprantemente absurd but can easily alter reality.

Be happy.

Popularity: 15% [ ? ]